Questions are growing around the Cubs’ clubhouse after third baseman Matt Shaw was left out of MLB’s pre-arbitration bonus pool despite delivering one of the team’s strongest second-half performances.
Shaw, who helped stabilize the infield and provided key offensive production down the stretch, received no bonus, even as several teammates with similar or lesser statistical output secured payouts.
According to those around him, Shaw isn’t lashing out — but he is making it clear he believes he earned an addition to his compensation because of how much he contributed to the team’s 2025 campaign.
Shaw’s Case for an Addition
Shaw’s second-half surge played a major role in keeping the Cubs competitive. He delivered improved power numbers, tightened his defensive mechanics at third base, and finished the season with metrics that outpaced multiple players who received bonuses.
For a system designed to reward breakout performances from early-career players, Shaw’s omission has drawn scrutiny.
“I Helped This Team Win”
While Shaw hasn’t made public criticism, those familiar with the situation say he’s been vocal internally:
he contributed, he helped the team win, and he believes that should be recognized financially.
A Debate Growing Around the League
The situation has sparked broader questions about MLB’s bonus-pool formula and whether it accurately reflects player value. Many around the team believe Shaw’s performance made him one of the Cubs’ most deserving young contributors — and that being left off the bonus list sends the wrong message.
For Shaw, the focus remains on preparing for next season. But the sentiment is clear:
a player who delivered at his level shouldn’t have been overlooked
